BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//CiviCRM//NONSGML CiviEvent iCal//EN
X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/London
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20261022T164500
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:CiviCRM_EventID_42612_7ab9f6c619f550dc0fe2e3707d93a025@www.middletemple.org.uk
SUMMARY:Philosophy and the Law | Some Reflections on the L
 aw Commission’s First Consultation Paper on Homici
 de
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
  "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"><html><body><html>\n <
 head>\n 	<title></title>\n </head>\n <body>\n <p>I
 n this presentation\, Professor Findlay Stark will
  reflect on some of the concepts informing the Law
  Commission’s current work on the reform of homici
 de law: see https://lawcom.gov.uk/project/law-of-h
 omicide/.</p>\n \n <p>He will contend that the Com
 mission’s consultation paper shows quite how undev
 eloped some familiar criminal law theory concepts&
 nbsp\;like the ‘correspondence principle’ and ‘fai
 r labelling’ are\, and how this makes assessing so
 me of the Commission's suggestions for reform diff
 icult. Although these concepts are being deployed 
 by the Law Commission specifically in the context 
 of homicide at present\, the difficulties to be di
 scussed are general ones that criminal law theory 
 could and should do more to resolve.</p>\n \n <hr 
 />\n <p style="color: rgb(170\, 170\, 170)\; font-
 style: italic\;">Student members (including transf
 erring lawyers) must attend all elements of the ev
 ent in order to be awarded the Qualifying Session.
  This includes any lecture/talk/reception/dinner/s
 peeches.</p>\n </body>\n </html></body></html>
DESCRIPTION:\n \n 	\n \n \n In this presentation\, Professor F
 indlay Stark will reflect on some of the concepts 
 informing the Law Commission’s current work on the
  reform of homicide law: see https://lawcom.gov.uk
 /project/law-of-homicide/.\n \n \n \n He will cont
 end that the Commission’s consultation paper shows
  quite how undeveloped some familiar criminal law 
 theory concepts like the ‘correspondence principle
 ’ and ‘fair labelling’ are\, and how this makes as
 sessing some of the Commission's suggestions for r
 eform difficult. Although these concepts are being
  deployed by the Law Commission specifically in th
 e context of homicide at present\, the difficultie
 s to be discussed are general ones that criminal l
 aw theory could and should do more to resolve.\n \
 n \n \n \n Student members (including transferring
  lawyers) must attend all elements of the event in
  order to be awarded the Qualifying Session. This 
 includes any lecture/talk/reception/dinner/speeche
 s.\n \n \n \n 
CATEGORIES:Domus Function
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
DTSTAMP;TZID=Europe/London:20261022T174500
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261022T174500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261022T203000
LOCATION:Sherrard Room\n Ashley Building\n Middle Temple La
 ne\n London\, EC4Y 9BT\n United Kingdom\n 
URL:https://www.middletemple.org.uk/civicrm/event/info?reset=1&id=42612
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
